← Products

24V Micro PCBA Screener + Guide

24V Micro GaN Servo PCBA

Screen bridge power loss, high-frequency phase current ripple, and illustrative thermal rise for compact 24V robotic joint, gimbal, and dexterous hand servo PCBAs.

Request an OEM engineering review
Interactive Tool

Micro PCBA sizing screener

Adjust the inputs for live, illustrative loss, ripple and cooling estimates. Defaults are examples, not hardware ratings.
Bridge proxy 3.20 W · ripple 2.08 A p-p

1–20 Arms. Fundamental RMS phase current; excludes ripple RMS.

20–200 kHz. PWM switching frequency. Higher PWM reduces ripple in low-inductance motors.

18–36 V. Nominal DC bus supply voltage (18V–36V battery or regulated rail).

2–300 µH. Per-phase equivalent; confirm conversion if the datasheet gives line-to-line inductance.

-20–75 °C. Ambient temperature inside joint housing or actuator chamber.

Thermal dissipation path proxy (assumed, not measured)

Both paths are sensitivity assumptions. Characterize the actual board, interface material and housing before sizing hardware.

Model OutputScenario calculated — hardware validation required

Bridge Loss Proxy

3.20 W

Cond: 1.67W | Sw: 1.34W | Dt: 0.18W

Current Ripple (p-p)

2.08 A

18.41% of peak (Below review trigger)

Thermal Proxy Rise

18.54 °C rise

Proxy ~48.54°C at 30°C amb.

Peak Phase Current

12.36 A peak

Includes ripple delta proxy

Assumptions: R100 = 8.7 mΩ; effective switching energy = 2.8 µJ per device per cycle at 24 V / 8 Arms, scaled linearly; dead time 25 ns; reverse drop 2.1 V. Excludes logic, gate-drive, copper, shunt, ripple RMS and motor losses. Ripple is not a worst-case bound; thermal proxy is not junction temperature or a safe current rating. Review equations and limits

Request an OEM engineering review

First recorded · Evidence reviewed · By GaN Servo

1. Conclusions for a 24V Micro GaN Servo PCBA Review

Use the screener to identify what needs investigation before committing a miniature servo PCBA to a motor or enclosure. Public component evidence supports design options; it does not establish a qualified GanServo board configuration.

Decision summary: known evidence and remaining uncertainty
ConclusionBasisNext decision
Higher PWM trades ripple for bridge lossShared illustrative model; equations and frequency table belowCompare both outputs, then measure motor and inverter heating
Cooling can dominate the screening outcomeDefault bridge proxy 3.20 W; assumed cooling impedances differCharacterize the actual board-to-enclosure path
24 V nominal does not establish voltage marginEPC2055 is a 40 V device; see manufacturer source belowReview maximum bus plus regeneration and overshoot against the selected BOM
Integration and manufacturing remain project-specificEPC9146 documents a reference architecture, not this boardAgree drawings, firmware, acceptance criteria and evidence before release

Evidence: EPC2055 manufacturer product data. EPC lists a 40 V device and a 2.5 × 1.5 mm die. This is not a 60 V part or a validated BOM for this screener.

Evidence: EPC9146 quick start guide, v2.0 (2022). A reference inverter using EPC2152 integrated power stages; the guide describes controller, sensing and protection interfaces. It is a different board, not a GanServo qualification record.

2. Calculation Method, Assumptions & Boundaries

The model is a steady-load sensitivity comparison with sinusoidal fundamental phase current. It fixes resistance at a reference temperature and does not iterate electrothermal feedback. Every constant below is an illustrative assumption, not a measured product parameter or an EPC2055 characterization.

Reproducible model definition (SI units in equations)
OutputEquation / assumptionLimit
ConductionPcond = 3 × Irms² × R100; R100 = 6 mΩ × [1 + 0.006 × (100 − 25)] = 8.7 mΩFixed reference; excludes ripple RMS and temperature feedback
SwitchingPsw = 6 × fsw × 2.8 µJ × (Irms / 8 A) × (Vbus / 24 V)2.8 µJ is an effective per-device, per-cycle energy assumption; linear scaling is unvalidated
Dead timePdt = 6 × fsw × 25 ns × 2.1 V × (2√2/π) × IrmsAssumed aggregate reverse-conduction interval; not an optimized gate setting
RippleΔIpp = Vbus / (8 × Lphase × fsw); ripple % = 100 × ΔIpp / (√2 × Irms)Simplified sensitivity proxy, not worst-case SVPWM ripple
Peak currentIpeak proxy = √2 × Irms + ΔIpp / 2Not a pulse-current or protection rating
ThermalΔT = Pbridge × Rpath; Tproxy = ambient + ΔTAssumed 5.8 or 18.2 °C/W; not junction or touch temperature

Excludes gate-drive, logic, shunt, PCB copper and motor losses, magnetic saturation, control dynamics and protection behavior. Use per-phase equivalent inductance; if the datasheet reports line-to-line inductance, confirm winding connection and conversion with the motor supplier before entry. The 25% ripple flag is an editorial review trigger. Above the 100°C resistance reference, temperature prediction is withheld; below it still requires hardware validation. High ripple also withholds temperature because the conduction estimate omits ripple RMS heating.

Screening method
Enter motor, bus and load dataCompare loss, ripple and coolingReplace assumptions with bench data
24V micro GaN servo PCBA screener with default inputs: 8 Arms, 80 kHz, 24 V, 18 µH and 30°C ambient
Actual software capture, 8 November 2026: the default chassis scenario calculates 3.20 W bridge loss, 2.08 A p-p ripple and 48.54°C thermal proxy. Reproduce these values with Reset in the tool. This demonstrates the calculation, not measured board performance or hardware qualification.

3. Micro PCBA Architecture & Integration Scope

Budget space for the power stage, control, feedback, power rails, connectors and protection together. A transistor footprint does not establish a complete servo board envelope. Decide early whether current control, encoder decoding and communication live on the PCBA or an external controller.

Figure 1: 24V Micro GaN Servo PCBA Hardware Architecture
Bus input, protection and DC linkController → gate drive → inverterMotor + current / encoder feedback

Evidence: EPC9146 quick start guide, v2.0 (2022). A reference inverter using EPC2152 integrated power stages; the guide describes controller, sensing and protection interfaces. It is a different board, not a GanServo qualification record.

Integration questions before schematic approval
BlockEvidence to requestFailure to avoid
Power stageSelected FET and driver BOM, supply limits and switching waveformsTreating tool input limits as hardware ratings
Control and feedbackLoop timing, ADC acquisition, encoder protocol and fault behaviorAssuming PWM frequency equals control-loop bandwidth
InterfacesPinout, connector retention, ESD and bus timing budgetUnverified CAN FD, EtherCAT or encoder compatibility

4. GaN vs Silicon: Compare the Complete Drive

Choose using a matched application comparison. This page has no measured silicon-versus-GaN board dataset and cannot assign a universal efficiency, price or footprint advantage.

Technology decision matrix; project measurements pending
DimensionGaN pathSilicon / alternative pathEvidence needed
Low-inductance motor rippleEvaluate higher PWM alongside increased switching lossEvaluate lower PWM, suitable motor inductance or filteringCurrent waveform and motor thermal test
CompactnessReview package assembly and short gate/power loopsCompare complete BOM and required heat spreadingRouted board and enclosure drawing
Development costInclude driver, probing, assembly and EMI iterationAn established silicon design may reduce engineering effortBOM, NRE and fixture quotation
Voltage headroomSelect a specific device with transient marginApply the same bus and transient reviewMaximum bus and measured overshoot

EPC2055 is a 40 V device, not a 60 V part. Its manufacturer data cannot justify a 36 V bus operating claim. Choose an appropriate voltage class only after reviewing bus tolerance, clamping, regeneration and measured overshoot.

Evidence: EPC2055 manufacturer product data. EPC lists a 40 V device and a 2.5 × 1.5 mm die. This is not a 60 V part or a validated BOM for this screener.

5. PWM Frequency: Ripple Reduction Has a Loss Cost

Figure 5: Bridge Loss & Current Ripple vs Switching Frequency

Illustrative bridge loss (W)

2.4340 kHz3.2080 kHz3.96120 kHz4.72160 kHz

Illustrative ripple (A p-p)

4.1740 kHz2.0880 kHz1.39120 kHz1.04160 kHz

Calculated from the same model as the tool: 24 V, 8 Arms, 18 µH. Sensitivity only; no measured waveforms.

Frequency sweep: 24 V, 8 Arms, 18 µH, assumed chassis path
PWM (kHz)Bridge proxy (W)Ripple (A p-p)Ripple / fundamental peakThermal proxy
402.434.1736.8%Outside model — temperature withheld
803.202.0818.4%48.54 °C proxy (not Tj)
1203.961.3912.3%52.96 °C proxy (not Tj)
1604.721.049.2%57.38 °C proxy (not Tj)

The inverse ripple relationship follows the model assumption. It does not prove that higher PWM removes motor chokes, eliminates acoustic noise or prevents demagnetization. Validate low-inductance motors over duty, speed and load, including peak current and magnetic saturation.

6. Dead Time: Establish a Measured Timing Window

Figure 2: Conceptual GaN Half-Bridge Dead-Time Sequence
Turn off the conducting deviceNon-overlap: reverse conductionTurn on the complementary device

Too little non-overlap can permit shoot-through; too much increases reverse-conduction loss. The model uses 25 ns as a sensitivity assumption, not a driver programming recommendation. Check propagation spread, temperature, gate waveform and layout before selecting a setting.

Evidence: TI LMG1210 product data and datasheet Rev. D. A gate-driver example with adjustable dead time in PWM mode and an external bootstrap diode. Driver timing needs checking against the selected FET and layout.

7. Layout & Stackup: Verify the Real Current Paths

Figure 3: Conceptual Multilayer PCB Thermal Path
FET pads and local decouplingCopper spreading + qualified viasInterface material → enclosure

Keep commutation and gate loops compact and separate noisy switch-node copper from sensing and encoder returns. Layer count, copper weight, dielectric spacing and via construction must follow the selected package, fabricator capability and electrical/thermal analysis. No universal sub-nanohenry loop or six-layer stackup is established here.

Layout review: proposed evidence, not measured board specifications
ConcernReview artifactValidation
Commutation loopFET/decoupling placement and return-path overlayMeasure drain overshoot and ringing with a suitable probe setup
Gate loopDriver return, gate path and local supply decouplingCheck gate overshoot, false turn-on and timing spread
Thermal vias / stackupPCB stackup and package assembly rulesThermal measurement plus fabricator DFM review

8. Current Sensing: Validate the Sampling Window

Current-feedback validation chain
Phase shunt and Kelvin routingAmplifier recovery + filteringADC timing → current controller

Inline sensing may provide current visibility where low-side sensing has short sampling windows. It still requires recovery after switching transients and enough acquisition time. Enhanced PWM rejection does not mean zero blanking or guaranteed valid samples at every duty cycle.

Evidence: TI INA240 product data and datasheet Rev. C. An enhanced PWM-rejection amplifier, with −4 to 80 V common-mode range and 400 kHz bandwidth. Bandwidth alone does not establish the usable ADC sampling window.

Sensing architecture tradeoffs
TopologyUseful propertyReview cost / constraint
Inline phase shuntsPhase-current visibility across switching statesCommon-mode transients, amplifier area, recovery and dissipation
Low-side shuntsGround-referenced sensing pathMinimum pulse width and reconstruction windows
Magnetic sensorPotential isolation and lower series lossPackage space, offset, bandwidth and interference

9. Cooling: Separate Assumptions from Ratings

The same bridge loss can yield different enclosure outcomes. The tool selects two assumed aggregate thermal impedances; neither is a measured board, TIM specification or manufacturer junction-to-ambient rating.

Cooling sensitivity: 24 V, 8 Arms, 80 kHz, 18 µH, 30°C ambient
Assumed pathImpedanceBridge proxyTemperature interpretation
Direct chassis coupling5.8 °C/W3.20 W48.54 °C proxy (not Tj)
Enclosed standoff18.2 °C/W3.20 W88.17 °C proxy (not Tj)

Characterize interface contact, housing temperature, preload and board bending. Add omitted heat sources and test the worst duty cycle. A lower predicted proxy does not establish component lifetime, safe touch temperature or a continuous current rating.

10. Regeneration: Budget Energy and Bus Headroom

Regenerative-energy decision path
Estimate returned kinetic energyCheck source / battery sink limitsSize storage, clamp or braking path

For an isolated capacitor, ΔE = ½ × Ceff × (Vmax² − Vstart²). The example below assumes 24 V rising to 30 V; 30 V is an illustrative endpoint, not a board trip or safe limit. Real usable headroom depends on all components and control thresholds.

Illustrative ideal capacitor energy, 24→30 V; no losses or control response
Effective capacitanceAdditional stored energyInterpretation
100 µF0.0162 JCompare with returned energy; validate ESR, DC bias and pulse current
470 µF0.0761 JCompare with returned energy; validate ESR, DC bias and pulse current
1000 µF0.1620 JCompare with returned energy; validate ESR, DC bias and pulse current

Obtain capacitance-versus-bias data for the selected MLCC part. A battery may reject charging because of BMS or charge-state limits; a regulated source may not sink at all. Confirm braking resistance pulse energy, clamp behavior and disconnected-bus faults on the actual assembly.

11. EMI: Gate Speed Is a Validation Variable

Faster edges can increase coupled noise and ringing. Tune gate drive, local decoupling, return paths, filtering and harness shielding together, then check the thermal cost. No fixed gate resistor value proves emissions compliance.

Risk, mitigation and release evidence
RiskMitigation to evaluateRequired evidence
Switching overshoot / false turn-onShort loops, driver return and measured gate tuningDrain and gate captures at worst bus/current
Encoder errors / current feedback corruptionRouting separation, supply filtering and valid sample windowsError counters and synchronized analog captures
System emissionsHarness, enclosure bonding, filtering and edge-rate tradeoffApplicable system-level pre-compliance and final test reports

Public GanServo EMC margins for this PCBA are not established here. Define the applicable standard and test configuration with the project team; reference-device characteristics cannot substitute for an accredited system test.

12. Mechanical Envelope & Fit Risks

Figure 4: Micro GaN Servo PCBA Mechanical Review
Choose annular / strip / split conceptReserve connectors, fasteners and TIMVerify assembly + service clearances

Annular concepts preserve a shaft opening; strip concepts suit narrow cavities; split boards can separate heat and sensing but add interconnect and assembly cost. Dimensions, heights, connector choices and cooling surfaces are unknown until a drawing is agreed. Request a STEP model and tolerance stack rather than treating a schematic illustration as a fit guarantee.

13. Worked Scenarios: Calculated, Not Measured Cases

These hypothetical scenarios use the shared tool model. Every row supplies its inputs, cooling assumption, interpretation and next action; no customer, prototype test or application qualification is implied.

Reproducible scenario comparison; all bus inputs 24 V
Concept / inputsCooling assumptionBridge proxy (W)Ripple A p-p (% of peak)Temperature / review
Finger-joint concept: 4 Arms, 120 kHz, 10 µH, 35°C ambient5.8 °C/W chassis1.562.50 (44.2%) — review triggerOutside model — temperature withheld. Review ripple against motor limits; higher PWM alone does not establish acceptable torque or temperature.
Gimbal concept: 6 Arms, 80 kHz, 25 µH, 30°C ambient5.8 °C/W chassis2.081.50 (17.7%)42.09 °C proxy (not Tj). Verify acoustic behavior, encoder errors and bracket thermal impedance on the assembled gimbal.
Sealed miniature actuator concept: 5 Arms, 100 kHz, 15 µH, 25°C ambient18.2 °C/W standoff1.842.00 (28.3%) — review triggerOutside model — temperature withheld. Add logic and copper loss; measure internal hotspots and enclosure temperature before choosing the cooling path.
Higher-current joint concept: 12 Arms, 80 kHz, 18 µH, 35°C ambient18.2 °C/W standoff6.052.08 (12.3%)Outside model — temperature withheld. The standoff proxy exceeds the reference; reduce load or evaluate a measured chassis thermal path.

Repeat a scenario in the tool and change one input at a time. When ripple and thermal flags conflict, evaluate both rather than increasing PWM without a loss budget. Request motor waveform and enclosure tests before approving the design direction.

14. Manufacturing, Cost & Release Evidence

Assembly and inspection requirements depend on the selected package and accepted reliability target. This page does not establish a GanServo production process capability, mandatory IPC voiding limit, lead time or completed compliance test.

Minimum RFQ and acceptance package
DeliverableWhat to agreeCost / schedule driver
Electrical scopeBus envelope, motor data, continuous/peak current and fault responseDevice selection, protection and validation iterations
DFM and assemblyFabrication files, stackup, stencil/reflow and package-specific acceptanceHDI features, yield and sourcing availability
Inspection and testAOI/X-ray applicability, electrical coverage, motor-load testing and traceabilityFixture NRE, test time and acceptance samples
Firmware and interfacesEncoder, communication, update path and fault handlingIntegration effort and maintenance scope
Release evidenceThermal, switching, protection and applicable system compliance reportsEnvironmental test, laboratory access and rework

For an RFQ, send drawings and the operating profile as well as tool results. If motor inductance, thermal path or regeneration is unknown, identify it explicitly and request a measurement plan. Confirm prototype milestones, NRE, recurring price and component substitutions in the quotation.

Prepare an OEM engineering inquiry

15. Questions by Design Decision

Selection & electrical limits

Is this a catalog-rated 24V micro GaN servo PCBA?

No catalog current, efficiency, dimensions or validated BOM is established here. The tool compares illustrative scenarios; request a project-specific drawing, BOM and test report before selecting hardware.

Does the 18–36 V tool range establish a safe bus range?

No. These are calculation input bounds. Supply tolerance, regeneration, measured switching overshoot and every component rating determine the actual allowable bus range.

Is EPC2055 a 60 V GaN FET?

No. EPC identifies EPC2055 as a 40 V device. The selected transistor must have adequate margin for the complete bus envelope; this page does not recommend EPC2055 for a 36 V bus.

When should a team compare silicon with GaN?

Compare both at the same motor, bus, current, cooling and EMI targets. GaN can enable higher switching frequency, but a silicon design may meet ripple and cost requirements with less development effort. Package size or device technology alone does not establish board efficiency.

Tool & model limits

What does the 25% ripple flag mean?

It is an editorial review trigger based on peak-to-peak ripple divided by fundamental peak current, not a motor safety limit. The simplified model does not cover every modulation angle, duty cycle or saturation condition.

Can higher PWM guarantee silent operation or prevent motor heating?

No. Within the proxy, higher PWM reduces ripple while increasing switching and dead-time loss. Acoustic behavior, motor heating and control stability require measurements on the actual motor and firmware.

Where do the loss and cooling constants come from?

They are explicitly selected sensitivity assumptions, not manufacturer curves or measured GanServo hardware data. Use the method section to reproduce the calculation and replace the proxy with measured device and enclosure data during design review.

Why is temperature withheld above 100°C?

The loss proxy fixes on-resistance at a 100°C reference and does not solve temperature feedback. Above that reference the tool withholds temperature prediction. Values below it are still not junction temperature, qualification results or safety approval.

Integration & validation

Does inline current sensing eliminate sampling constraints?

No. Inline sensing can extend current visibility, but amplifier transient recovery, filtering, ADC acquisition and PWM duty still constrain useful samples. Validate the entire signal chain with switching waveforms.

Are encoder and communication protocols guaranteed?

No interface configuration is established by this page. Specify the encoder supply and protocol, bus topology, latency and connector allocation in the RFQ; confirm them against the agreed schematic and firmware scope.

Will a battery absorb all regenerative braking energy?

No. Charge state, BMS limits and disconnected supply states can prevent energy return. Calculate the returned energy and verify a sink, braking path or clamp against component voltage and pulse-energy limits.

Does this page prove EMC or medical-device compliance?

No. There is no project-specific compliance evidence here. Define applicable requirements, test the final enclosure and harness, and request the corresponding signed reports. A board-level thermal proxy cannot establish medical touch-temperature or safety compliance.

Manufacturing & RFQ

Which SMT and inspection limits apply?

Use the selected package vendor recommendations and an agreed assembly acceptance plan. Stencil, reflow, cleaning, voiding, AOI, X-ray and electrical-test coverage must be specified for the actual assembly; no universal voiding threshold is claimed here.

Are prototype lead time and price confirmed?

No. BOM availability, PCB stackup, fixtures, firmware scope, test coverage and quantity affect both. Request a quote with explicit assumptions, NRE, recurring cost and delivery milestones.

What should I send for an engineering review?

Send bus min/nominal/max and regeneration conditions, phase resistance and inductance measurement method, continuous RMS and peak current with duration, duty cycle, ambient and cooling, mechanical envelope, encoder/bus requirements and quantities.

What if my motor data is unknown or JavaScript is disabled?

Do not infer a hardware rating from the defaults. Read the method and evidence below and use the contact link to request a review with the available motor datasheet and mechanical drawing. The report and FAQ work without JavaScript.

16. Evidence Register & Remaining Unknowns

Sources checked on . Manufacturer documents describe their own products and test conditions. Tool constants and all numerical scenarios are explicitly illustrative; there are no GanServo board measurement or certification records on this page.

Evidence: EPC9146 quick start guide, v2.0 (2022). A reference inverter using EPC2152 integrated power stages; the guide describes controller, sensing and protection interfaces. It is a different board, not a GanServo qualification record.

Evidence: EPC2055 manufacturer product data. EPC lists a 40 V device and a 2.5 × 1.5 mm die. This is not a 60 V part or a validated BOM for this screener.

Evidence: TI LMG1210 product data and datasheet Rev. D. A gate-driver example with adjustable dead time in PWM mode and an external bootstrap diode. Driver timing needs checking against the selected FET and layout.

Evidence: TI INA240 product data and datasheet Rev. C. An enhanced PWM-rejection amplifier, with −4 to 80 V common-mode range and 400 kHz bandwidth. Bandwidth alone does not establish the usable ADC sampling window.

Still to confirm for an actual order: qualified BOM, current and voltage ratings, efficiency, dimensions, firmware interfaces, thermal impedance, inspection coverage, applicable compliance, price and lead time. Request project-specific evidence through the engineering inquiry.

Explore Adjacent 24V GaN Servo Hardware

Compare companion servo modules, three-phase drive boards, and integrated driver-encoder stacks for low-voltage actuation:

Inquiry Email

[email protected]

Include target torque/speed, quantity, and delivery location.

Instant Chat

WhatsApp Engineering Support

Direct response from our engineering team.